Andreas Hartmann wrote: > Joern Nettingsmeier schrieb: >> Andreas Hartmann wrote: >>> Jörn, >>> >>> Jörn Nettingsmeier schrieb: >>>
[...] >>>> our content repository is document-centric and allows for >>>> arbitrary xml. >>>> that's good. blog content is simple and belongs in a database. >>> IMO a blog isn't an atypical Lenya application. >>> The major problem I see is that the blog publication contains >>> a lot of complex legacy code. It would be great if we could simplify >>> and modularize it to improve the maintainability. >> we should withdraw the blog from the rc (at least mark it as >> work-in-progress and hide it from the welcome screen) and clean it up >> thoroughly before announcing it as part of a lenya release. the last >> time i checked, it was neither stable nor had the minimum feature set of >> a true blog, and it is certainly not on par with the rest of lenya. > > +1 > > I don't have a good feeling about releasing the blog in its > current state either. I did some testing and bugfixing, but the > amount of bugs which occured somewhat discouraged me. > > What do the others think? > +1 to make a rc without the blog publication. IMHO it is more important to have a 1.4 RC. Jann --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
