Andreas Hartmann wrote:
Joern Nettingsmeier schrieb:
Bob Harner wrote:
On 3/15/07, Richard Frovarp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
They are part of XHTML strict. However, by default the RNG schema used
is only a subset of the full XHTML specification. Looks like you'll need
to look at ./src/modules/xhtml/resources/schemas/xhtml.rng and make sure
you are including xhtml/modules/table.rng. I think if you comment out
the basic schema in exchange for either XHTML or XHTML-strict you should
be okay. Will need to build again.
If true, can anyone explain why the RNG schema used for these editors
doesn't contain the full XHTML spec?
i have wondered the same. while it does make sense in many cases to
restrict the set of allowed xhtml elements in custom doctypes, the
default one should provide full xhtml support imho. (plus the current
set of allowed elements does not make all that much sense...)
can anyone comment on this?
I don't remember a reason for the restriction. Maybe it will become
obvious when we change it, though ...
otherwise i'd consider it a bug.
+1
It's certainly an FAQ, we should do something about it.
i've filed a bug and will look into it in a few days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
