Andreas Hartmann schrieb: > Thorsten Scherler schrieb: [...]
>> I think if it is working that is better then have a dependency on >> mod_jk. > > What's wrong with mod_jk? AFAIK it is the recommended connector anyway, > at least until mod_proxy_ajp is generally accepted > (http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg32372.html). mod_proxy_ajp gives the best results up to now. It took me a while to find out I had to use the following proxy rules: <Location /> ProxyPass ajp://localhost:8009/default/authoring/ ProxyPassReverse https://cms.example.com/default/authoring/ </Location> But now it's running fine and I didn't face any problems yet. A problem might be that it's only shipping with Apache 2.2.x, but at least we might finally have a working proxy solution which doesn't cause much of a headache. WDYT about recommending mod_proxy_ajp? Maybe someone can even share real-world experiences with this module? -- Andreas -- Andreas Hartmann, CTO BeCompany GmbH http://www.becompany.ch --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
