Jörn Nettingsmeier schrieb: > hi everyone! > > grepping after unrelated issues, i found out that we seem to offer both > a site: protocol as documented in > http://lenya.apache.org/docs/2_0_x/reference/protocols/site.html > and the new lenya-document: protocol (not currently documented afaict, > but it's the one with the nifty syntax that allows arbitrary parts to be > left out). > > imho lenya-document: is a complete superset of site:'s features and > vastly superior. can we get rid of site: before we let it loose on the > world and have to support it forever? or are there conceivable cases > where site: cannot be readily replaced by lenya-document: ?
ATM they are orthogonal. lenya-document: handles UUIDs, site: handles paths in the site structure. Neither addresses the behaviour of the other one. I'd like to keep them separated so that it is always clear what one is dealing with - what do the others think? -- Andreas -- Andreas Hartmann, CTO BeCompany GmbH http://www.becompany.ch --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
