On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 06:48 -0400, Bob Harner wrote: > > > > > > Bugs we need to fix before releasing 2.0. > > > > > > > > > > wouldn't it be easier to just fix all bugs that have 2.0 as a target > > > > > milestone and are "major" or worse? could save a lot of bug tagging > > > > > work.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > you mean > > > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=Lenya&target_milestone=2.0&long_desc_type=substring&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailcc2=1&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0= > > > > ? > > > > > > This does it: > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=Lenya&target_milestone=2.0&bug_status=__open__ > > > > > > Or the equivalent: http://tinyurl.com/ytvqcj :-) > > > > > > This is the list of bugs that we intend to fix before the 2.0 release. > > > The Priority tells you the importance, and anything that we don't > > > expect to fix before 2.0 should have its target changed accordingly. > > > So I'm with Jörn in not seeing a great need for a tracking bug in this > > > case, although I don't object to Thorsten maintaining it :-) > > > > > > > Do you really think that this 19 bugs are all blocker for a release. IMO > > no and further I do not see that we will fix them within the time frame > > I suggested. > > No, only 42952 and 43136 are marked as blockers (in the more strict > sense). But I don't mean to argue with you -- there is no harm in > maintaining the tracking bug if you want :-)
jeje, ok. > But if we don't intend > to fix the other 16 before the 2.0 release then maybe we should change > their targets to 2.0.1 now. I totally agree. > > BTW, your tracking bug lists 40600 probably by mistake, since that's a > 1.2.x issue. Our tracking bug ;) list 40600 because Jörn pointed it out one day, but I guess he mixed it up. Jörn do you remember the right bug number? salu2 -- Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org Open Source Java consulting, training and solutions --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
