DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43813>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43813 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-19 05:13 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > andreas, if you think multiple doctypes per module are important, let's > implement > /modules/<moduleName>/schemas/<resourceTypeName>.rng in every doctype module > sitemap and get rid of the configuration and input module. wdyt? That would be very convenient, but the problem is that we don't know which module the resource type is provided by ... Maybe we could introduce a convention for resource type names: {module} if only one resource type is provided by the module {module}.{resourceType} if multiple resource types are provided The module name could be extracted by the resource type module: {resource-type:module:{doc-info:....:resourceType}} But then it's only a small step to the situation which we have now. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
