Hi Jörn

Am 20.11.2007 um 20:56 schrieb Jörn Nettingsmeier:

Jürgen Ragaller wrote:
Hi, Jörn
Am 16.11.2007 um 13:01 schrieb Jörn Nettingsmeier:

over my very dead corpse.
if a certain software vendor cannot be bothered to provide the most trivial bugfixes and read a f"$§%ing spec, that's really not our problem. anyone with half a brain can download and understand the relevant standards documents, and if the world's largest pile of software engineers can't be bothered, well, tough luck for their users.
Just to make shure we don't misunderstand each other on this one.
The removing of the xml declaration (remove only <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>) would not make the page invalid:
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.webstandards.org%2F

sigh. you are of course right, the xml declaration is not mandatory.
but it does provide a very unambigous hint as to xml version and encoding that makes a whole lot more sense than those grafted-on <meta/> tags with their "; content-encoding=FOO". and there is absolutely no excuse whatsoever to change one's parsing behaviour depending on this processing instruction. if it were, the instruction should say <?IE createAFsckingMessOfMyCode="yes"?>.

well, i don't want to punish IE users (although somebody should do it, someday), and much less fellow admins who have to get their jobs done. if it can be demonstrated that the xml declaration can be omitted without the slightest bit of regression in xml-conformant browsers (including the encoding setting), then well, let's omit it and wait for microsoft and the last of their broken browsers to die of old age. should be any day now :)


or maybe we could resurrect a server-side browser selector and use two different xhtml serializers. but this would imply having a centralized final transformation step in the global sitemap, unless we want to duplicate this selector all over the place. i have put a patch in bugzilla a while ago that tries to accomplish this, but it does so by breaking all badly modularized features (bxe, webdav and some other ad-hoc stuff currently in the default pub sitemap).

We avoid the xml declaration for all our websites - I am not aware of any side effects.

My suggestion is to leave the already inserted ie6hacksonly.css in for 2.0 and remove the xml declaration and the quirks mode override part of ie6hacksonly.css. for 2.0.1.

Jürgen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to