On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 15:33 +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote: > Jörn Nettingsmeier schrieb: > > Andreas Hartmann wrote: > >> Hi Lenya devs, > >> > >> I have noticed that the new FOP version (0.94) is in some aspects > >> superior to the one used by the Cocoon FOP block (0.20.5). I found it > >> much easier to configure. > >> > >> Cocoon 2.2 contains a new FOP serializer which is compatible with the > >> current FOP version. Would it be OK for you to switch to this version? > >> We could for instance add a "pdf" module, include the serializer with > >> svn:externals and the FOP 0.94 library. > >> > >> WDYT? > > > > sounds good in principle. but i wonder: how much 2.2 infrastructure will > > need backporting? can it break stuff, and how much larger will the > > source tree become? > > Another option would be to create a branch and migrate the trunk to 2.2 > (not only for the FOP module, but for General Progress (TM)). Maybe it > even makes sense to convert modules to Cocoon blocks.
Jeje, I just waited for this. ;) IMO it should be possible since we do not use too much the mount-through facility of the sitemap (this one of the major differences). IMO we need to face this update sooner then later. salu2 -- Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org Open Source Java consulting, training and solutions --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
