On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:44:06 +0100, [email protected] wrote: > Jann Forrer <[email protected]> schrieb am 13.03.2009 08:44:12: > >> Andreas Hartmann wrote: >> > Hi Lenya devs, >> > >> > some modules from the 2.0.2 branch look like they weren't maintained >> > for quite some time. If noone objects, I'd suggest to remove them – >> > mainly to avoid wrong anticipations and to keep the codebase clean. If >> > someone uses them, they can still get them from old releases. >> > > I agree to remove them from the branch to keep the codebase handy and > clean. > > Since a new user or dev interested in one of these modules > for his own development won't find them in an old release, > I would prefer to move them to an other location outside the branch. > What about a new svn branch like contributions as Thorsten proposed > earlier during the modules discussion ?
If I can add, my "user view" to this discussion, I'm +10 with the Rudolf idea, with a personal add : If this branch is set up, a little word on this branch in the "official download page" will be great. I think that this new branch is very important in order to "show the power of Lenya" : for example, blog module is IMO and important end-user function and this module have to be "easy download". PS: thanks for the work on 2.2 branch HAND > This could also be the place for useful add-on contributions like exmaple > publications > or modules, which have to be maintained by the users. > (e.g. the publications from the design contest) > > Rudolf > >> > >> > Some candidates (feel free to add more): >> > >> > * blog >> > * migration (lacks documentation, could be moved to sandbox?) >> > * simplesite >> > * xopus >> > * task (legacy) >> > * jcrsource (optional) >> > >> > WDYT? >> I am relly not very experienced in the 2.0.2 branch but I like >> spring cleaning ;-) Anyway, from my side: no objection. >> >> Jann >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
