Am 16.07.10 12:11, schrieb Rainer Schöpf:
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> if there is a consensus to switch to Maven in the 2.1 branch, I'd still
like
> to address some issues beforehand:
>
> Should we keep the web application structure? At the moment, files like
XSLT
> stylesheets etc. are just copied to the webapp directory. With Maven, a
> module is usually deployed in a single file, e.g. a JAR file.
That's the default, but there is no reason why it has to be so. More precisely,
this the default goal of the package phase of the default lifecycle if you
specify jar packaging in the toplevel pom.xml file.
For lenya, war packaging is probably the right thing.
Yes, as far as the whole web application is concerned. But what about
single modules? If we switch to Maven, my idea would be to build modules
as Maven projects. The dependency tree of a module could look like this:
lenya.modules.foobar
\- lenya.core-api
\- lenya.modules.foo
\- lenya.modules.bar
WDYT?
-- Andreas
--
Andreas Hartmann, CTO
BeCompany GmbH
http://www.becompany.ch
Tel.: +41 (0) 43 818 57 01
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lenya.apache.org
