On 09/22/2010 04:57 PM, Richard Frovarp wrote:
On 09/22/2010 07:30 AM, florent andré wrote:
Hi all,
Currently, we have :
- 2_0_X :
* with the patch provide by Doug ( bug on publish present in 2.0.3
release)
- 2_1_x :
* patched for publishing bug
* is java 6 compliant
* have a clean editor status.
- Trunk :
* lenya with c2.2
* compilation is ok (just a little test fail)
* many little components configurations have to be done for a working
version.
What did we do ?
3 branches are too many to maintain imo - we are not enough big for this.
We have to "close" one I think.
I propose to release the 2_0_x on 2.0.4 for reflect the bug solving and
continue work on trunk and 2.1.x.
What do you think about this ?
I agree with shutting down 2_0_x in favor of 2_1_x. Doing a release of
what would be 2.0.4 would be okay. Not much has changed and doing the
release would be pretty easy if someone wanted to do the work for that.
If needed, I can do this release. Just said me how.
I'm still uncertain about 2.2 / trunk. We also want to do a clean design
with v3.
Yes sure. we have to discuss on it.
2.2 / trunk is imo a good thing for learn maven, c2.2 and a piece of
osgi (I read somewhere that c2.2 is enable for osgi)... This will be
usefull for v3
On the other hand, 2.2 don't work for now. Errors are not too difficult
to solve (for now), but I don't know how many they are (and how long
they took).
V3 is something that we *have to* design.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lenya.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lenya.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lenya.apache.org
