Thanks! That helps enormously.

-- 
Hutson Betts
Computer Science and Engineering
Texas A&M University


On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 10:06 -0500, Tom Davis wrote:
> 
> On Nov 18, 2011, at 7:03 PM, Hutson Betts <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > I was wondering if anyone had any insight into proper method
> > documentation. While working on the OpenNebula driver, I have been
> > attempting to expound upon existing docstrings. However, I can't find
> > any definitive Python style guide, nor is there a definitive authority
> > within the libcloud library.
> > 
> > Any help with the documentation style I should go with would be greatly
> > appreciated.
> > 
> > Here are a few examples of inconsistencies:
> > 
> > OpenStack.ex_save_image
> >    @keyword    node: node to use as a base for image
> >        @param      node: L{Node}
> >        @keyword    name: name for new image
> >        @param      name: C{string}
> > 
> > * There are no spaces between (keyword, param) pairs. Furthermore,
> > unlike the next example, which uses (keyword, type) pairs, this method
> > uses (keyword, param) pairs.
> > 
> > OpenStack.create_node
> >        @keyword    ex_metadata: Key/Value metadata to...
> >        @type       ex_metadata: C{dict}
> > 
> >        @keyword    ex_files:   File Path => File contents to create on
> >                                the node
> >        @type       ex_files:   C{dict}
> > 
> > * In addition, the above function places an extra line between (keyword,
> > type) pairs. Below, the base class uses (keyword, type) pairs with a
> > space between each pair.
> > 
> > Base.create_node
> >        @keyword    size:   The size of resources...
> >                            (required)
> >        @type       size:   L{NodeSize}
> > 
> >        @keyword    image:  OS Image to boot on node. (required)
> >        @type       image:  L{NodeImage}
> > 
> > * Another example of (keyword, type) pair.
> > 
> > OpenStack.ex_update_node
> >        @keyword    name:   New name for the server
> >        @type       name:   C{str}
> > 
> > * In the following example, we have a method parameter. Therefore, the
> > 'param' term is used in place of 'keyword'. However, in this example,
> > the term 'type' comes before the term 'param', which is different than
> > above.
> > 
> > OpenStack.ex_rebuild
> >        @type image: C{NodeImage}
> >        @param image: New image to use.
> > 
> > * However, it's the same as the example in EC2.
> > 
> > EC2.ex_describe_tags
> >        @type node: C{Node}
> >        @param node: Node instance
> > 
> > * Another type of documentation question, how to return. Here we see a
> > return line given with '@return:'.
> > 
> > OpenStack.ex_limits
> >        @return: C{dict} with keys 'rate' and 'absolute'
> > 
> > * Same in the base class.
> > 
> > Base.reboot_node
> >        @return: C{bool} True if the reboot was successful, ...
> > 
> > * However, in this OpenStack method, a (return, type) pair are given
> > rather than '@return:'.
> > 
> > OpenStack.ex_get_metadata
> >        @return     Key/Value metadata associated with node.
> >        @type       C{dict}
> > 
> 
> The answers to all your questions may be found on the epydoc site, a tool 
> used to specify and generate Python documentation:
> 
> http://epydoc.sourceforge.net/manual-epytext.html
> 
> I believe most of your examples are functionally equivalent; the order of 
> tokens generally doesn't matter (type vs param, etc.) and the exact format of 
> the value is not specified (you can say C{bool} or merely describe the type, 
> for instance. The more markup the better, generally, as it's easier to scan 
> in markup and interlinks docs). 
> 
> > -- 
> > Hutson Betts
> > Computer Science and Engineering
> > Texas A&M University
> > 
> > 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to