+1 (binding)

did some basic tests on PC Extreme cloud.

> On Oct 27, 2015, at 10:39 PM, anthony shaw <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> [+1]  Release Apache Libcloud 0.19.0
> 
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:26 AM, Sebastien Goasguen <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> give me couple hours, just back from two days off-line
>> 
>>> On Oct 27, 2015, at 5:20 PM, Eric Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Reminder: vote thread is targeted to close tomorrow.  We can keep it open
>>> longer, but a vote now would be much appreciated.
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> Eric
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Tomaz Muraus <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Just had a look and everything passed.
>>>> 
>>>> [+1]  Release Apache Libcloud 0.19.0
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> 
>>>> Also to clarify it - the difference between this and now closed proposed
>>>> 0.19.0 release is that this one includes a fix for a bug in the
>> Dimension
>>>> Data driver.
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Eric Johnson <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Note: past vote thread was closed, this thread replaces it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This is a voting thread for Libcloud 0.19.0.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This release contains numerous new features, improvements and bug
>> fixes.
>>>>> The full change log can be found at
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=libcloud.git;a=blob;f=CHANGES.rst;h=75342fd1eea9706276ad35f963cdd454da5efeda;hb=4fadb5631ee05898452d622f7493fb30a999bee1
>>>>> .
>>>>> FYI, the git tag v0.19.0-tentative points to the correct hash (4fadb56)
>>>> on
>>>>> Apache infrastructure, but is stale on the github mirror.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Release artifacts can be found at
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~erjohnso/libcloud/.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Note that KEYS file can found at
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/libcloud/KEYS
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please test the release and post your votes.
>>>>> 
>>>>> +/- 1
>>>>> [  ]  Release Apache Libcloud 0.19.0
>>>>> 
>>>>> Vote will be open until October 28th, 2015 (or longer, if needed).
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Eric
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to