Great to hear

Samuel Marks
http://linkedin.com/in/samuelmarks

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 4:01 AM, Eric Johnson <erjoh...@apache.org> wrote:

> Outstanding!
>
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 3:13 AM, Tomaz Muraus <to...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Nice :thumbsup:
> >
> > We used to run coverage.py and upload reports to Apache build servers,
> but
> > this hasn't been running for a while now and it was kinda pain to
> maintain
> > so I'm all for outsourcing it to a 3rd party service :)
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 11:58 AM, anthony shaw <anthony.p.s...@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > As part of a goal to get more frequent releases, we have to keep our
> > > test coverage reasonably high and also make sure we don't merge
> > > untested code or unreachable/unmaintable code.
> > >
> > > The infra team have kindly enabled Coveralls.IO support and I've
> > > enabled this in TOX as part of our build.
> > >
> > > You can see now the reports -
> > > https://coveralls.io/github/apache/libcloud?branch=trunk when people
> > > raise pull requests it should add a comment to say whether the
> > > coverage has gone up or down.
> > >
> > > Coveralls has a neat interactive coverage viewer online, you can
> > > inspect code blocks covered for a build, its a lot easier than using
> > > coverage reports!
> > >
> > > We're at a healthy 90%- a great place to start from. It already
> > > uncovered an untested module, the storage driver for ninefold (who no
> > > longer exist!)
> > >
> > > Ant
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to