Great to hear
Samuel Marks http://linkedin.com/in/samuelmarks On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 4:01 AM, Eric Johnson <erjoh...@apache.org> wrote: > Outstanding! > > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 3:13 AM, Tomaz Muraus <to...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Nice :thumbsup: > > > > We used to run coverage.py and upload reports to Apache build servers, > but > > this hasn't been running for a while now and it was kinda pain to > maintain > > so I'm all for outsourcing it to a 3rd party service :) > > > > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 11:58 AM, anthony shaw <anthony.p.s...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > As part of a goal to get more frequent releases, we have to keep our > > > test coverage reasonably high and also make sure we don't merge > > > untested code or unreachable/unmaintable code. > > > > > > The infra team have kindly enabled Coveralls.IO support and I've > > > enabled this in TOX as part of our build. > > > > > > You can see now the reports - > > > https://coveralls.io/github/apache/libcloud?branch=trunk when people > > > raise pull requests it should add a comment to say whether the > > > coverage has gone up or down. > > > > > > Coveralls has a neat interactive coverage viewer online, you can > > > inspect code blocks covered for a build, its a lot easier than using > > > coverage reports! > > > > > > We're at a healthy 90%- a great place to start from. It already > > > uncovered an untested module, the storage driver for ninefold (who no > > > longer exist!) > > > > > > Ant > > > > > >