Just a heads up - here is a WIP PR with those changes -
https://github.com/apache/libcloud/pull/1377

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 12:53 PM anthony shaw <anthony.p.s...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Here you go https://pypistats.org/packages/apache-libcloud
>
> However- remember that many of the Python 2.7 downloads are linked to older
> versions of libcloud.
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 11:42 AM Samuel Marks <samuelma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Anthony prepared some statistics a while back showing the proportion of
> > users on each version of Python. Maybe an updated chart will help
> convince
> > the community here?
> >
> > Samuel Marks
> > http://linkedin.com/in/samuelmarks
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 10:17 PM anthony shaw <anthony.p.s...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >  Considering libcloud has had the Metadata 1.2 tag for the minimum
> > required
> > > Python version, if we dropped 2.7 and 3.3, 3.4, then users would simply
> > > install an old version.
> > > https://packaging.python.org/guides/dropping-older-python-versions/
> > >
> > > We put those attributes over a year ago.
> > >
> > > I'd be hugely in favor, there would be a lot of other simplicity and
> > > refactoring that could be done around the storage driver, the file
> > > handling, buffering, string interpolation, etc.
> > >
> > > We have stable versions of Libcloud that support 2.7, users would still
> > use
> > > those. We should decide if we want to maintain a 'critical fix only'
> > > branch.
> > >
> > > Another consideration in the future would be the async support for the
> > API,
> > > which attempts to do have stalled because we have to support Python 2
> and
> > > 3.4.
> > >
> > > Anthony Shaw
> > >
> > > ------------------------------
> > > *From:* Tomaz Muraus <to...@apache.org>
> > > *Sent:* Wednesday, November 20, 2019 7:18 pm
> > > *To:* dev@libcloud.apache.org
> > > *Subject:* [dev] Dropping support for old Python versions (2.7 and 3.4)
> > >
> > > Everyone,
> > >
> > > Python 2.7 is reaching EOL in just a couple of months. I think makes
> > sense
> > > for us to drop support for all the Python versions which are not
> actively
> > > supported and maintained anymore.
> > >
> > > This means Python 2.7, Python 3.4 and PyPy 2.
> > >
> > > A lot of the larger and popular Python projects have already done that
> > > (py.test, paramiko, eventlet, etc.).
> > >
> > > I propose dropping support for those two versions in a next major
> release
> > > which should coincide with Python 2.7 EOL date.
> > >
> > > Dropping support for Python 2.7 will also allow us to eventually get
> rid
> > of
> > > our libcloud.utils.py3 wrapper and remove a lot of Python 2 and Python
> 3
> > > compatibility code (which will also result in cleaner and easier to
> read
> > > code).
> > >
> > > Do keep in mind though that the plan is to approach this in an
> > incremental
> > > manner.
> > >
> > > First step will just be stopping testing with those Python versions and
> > > removing those versions from classifiers section in setup.py.
> > >
> > > Actually getting rid of "libcloud.utils.py3" and other Python 2 / 3
> > > compatibility code will be much more involved and likely take much more
> > > time.
> > >
> > > What do others think?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Tomaz
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to