While I see the project has made a new release with a bunch of cleaned
up code - excellent news! - the board still wants to confirm that there
are sufficient PMC members who expect to *continue* to be active enough
on the project going forward to deal with potential security issues or
the like.
It's fine if projects are mostly dormant (as you've noted in reports due
to the nature of the code), but the board would like an explicit
acknowledgement of at least three PMC members here. Folks can either
reply-all here, or you can include an explicit listing of PMC members
who are still active enough in your next report.
Thanks for all the work, and getting a new release out!
--
- Shane Curcuru
Director
On Behalf of the ASF Board of Directors
On 2023/07/23 20:39:45 Shane Curcuru wrote:
(Note mixed public/private lists to get whole LibCloud community)
Dear LibCloud PMC members and committers:
The board report for Libcloud was not submitted for this month's board
meeting or for May, June, or July. This indicates that the project
might not have enough engaged PMC members to provide proper oversight of
the project. A review of your mailing lists similarly shows little to
zero project activity over a period of months.
LibCloud PMC members must respond to this board roll call as noted here:
https://apache.org/dev/pmc.html#roll-call
Failing to see at least three active PMC members to provide oversight,
the board will likely post an announcement that the project will be
going into the Attic, unless more activity in the project picks up.
Going into the attic is an important step for our users, since that lets
end users understand that some software is not actively being
maintained. The attic ensures all project data is maintained read only.
https://apache.org/dev/pmc.html#move-to-attic
Thanks for your attention,
