On Saturday 12 March 2005 09:18, Laurent Godard wrote: > Hi all > > Daniel Naber (Hi daniel) reported that using thesaurus V1 in OOo 2 lead > to crash. He opened a bug report and proposed a patch > http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44163 > No update on it ... > > I'm actually writing DicOOo2 and raises the question for the thesaurus > presentation to users so that it is unambiguous between V1 and V2 > > I can detect OOo version, so i can present different list depending on > this version to users > > First the actual naming of the new thesaurus files is IMHO not so good > the "-new" is added is added to the name. It is not explicit. i would > see some "-V2" string. (What happens if we have an other change, a > -new-new suffix ? ;) > > For DicOOo, I need a list. Actually, it uses thesavail.lst, listing all > V1 thesaurus. There is 2 ways for handling V2 thesaurus > > - Continue to use this list and it's DicOOo work to manage, regarding > filename, finding the thesaurus version - Dangerous and not clean IMHO > > - create a new thesavail2.lst file listing only OOo2.0 compatible > thesaurus. I think this is more clean
I'd vote for a thesavail2.lst since I have to maintain them. It seems simpler and less prone to errors. Rmember, all these changes are not *automatic*. They require somebody to remember how they go together. My memory isn't what it used to be, but the more complicated it gets the more apt to foreget something. Also, it's not something I do 10 times a day, but sometimes once a month. Granted, I can see a large number of changes happening soon. regards, Richard. > Any opinion ? > > Laurent --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
