Hi Marcin,
The Hebrew dictionary isn't UTF-8 either, but ISO-8859-8. Could the
difference in size of the affix file make that much difference?
Alan
Marcin Miłkowski wrote:
Hi Alan,
I don't think it's the reason. Polish dictionary file is about 4 MB
and it loads fast (however the affix file is about 200K). Check it
yourself. However, it's not UTF-8 - it's ISO-8859-2. Maybe UTF-8 makes
it slower?
Regards,
Marcin
Alan Yaniger napisał(a):
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for your reply. I downloaded Hunspell and checked a very small
text with Hebrew dictionaries. There was a considerable delay until
hunspell exited. When I checked the same Hebrew text or a similarly
small English text using English dictionaries, hunspell exited
immediately.
Could the size of the dictionaries be the reason for the delay? Here
are the sizes of the Hebrew and English dictionaries:
386,182 he_IL.aff
3,103,184 he_IL.dic
696,131 en_US.dic
3,045 en_US.aff
Alan
Daniel Naber wrote:
On Friday 27 April 2007 10:18, Alan Yaniger wrote:
Is the problem in the the way the dictionaries were
created?
I suggest you download hunspell and use it to check a very small
text. This way you can see if the problem is in OOo or in the
spellchecker component (hunspell). You could also compare with
myspell. As hunspell has more features than myspell, it might be
slower.
Regards
Daniel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
