Hi, Thanks a lot for testing. The weird thing is, I am using Hunspell 1.2.7 and , though your test results show that my aff file is correct, my results with Hunspell on Linux still gives me wrong results:
test.txt: kediler kedilar kedilere kedilera [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ hunspell -d turkish < test.txt Hunspell 1.2.7 + kedi & kedilar 2 0: kediler, kedi + kedi + kedi So it still thinks kedilera is correct. Could this be a regression in the new version? Can anyone with hunspell 1.2.7 confirm this? Mehmet On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 11:06 PM, ge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mehmet, > > Some additional tests, they all seem to be ok: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/program/hunspell-1.2.1/src/tools$ example /tmp/turkish.aff > /tmp/turkish.dic /tmp/x1 > "kedi" is okay > "kediler" is okay > "kedilere" is okay > "kedilera" is incorrect! > suggestions: > ..."kediler" > "kedilar" is incorrect! > suggestions: > ..."kedi" > ..."elmalar" > ..."dolaplar" > ..."dolap" > "kedilara" is incorrect! > suggestions: > ..."kedi" > "elma" is okay > "elmalar" is okay > "elmalara" is okay > "elmaler" is incorrect! > suggestions: > ..."elma" > ..."kediler" > "elmalere" is incorrect! > suggestions: > ..."elma" > "elmalera" is incorrect! > suggestions: > ..."elma" > "elmalare" is incorrect! > suggestions: > ..."elmalar" > > What do you think? > > -eleonora > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
