1. In Dzongkha (Asian Language that i am working in)
2. I mean, root word and word formed after affixation to this root
word.
Does the meaning of those words have to be related or can they
differ. Just curious to know since in my language many words can be formed
from a single root word after affixations, but in some case its meaning are
not related to its root word.
For example, in English, for a root word work, we have working, rework,
worked...etc. which all of them are related to the root word work.
Thanks.
Regards,
Cthar
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 12:15 PM, ge <eleonor...@gmx.net> wrote:
> >>
> Hi,
> Sorry, if my question seems to be non-relevance..
> The question is...
> Does the meaning of a word formed after applying the affixes have to be
> related to its root word.
> Or can it be different.
> Thanks...
> Regards,
> Cthar.
> <<
>
> 1. In which language?
>
> 2. compounding and affixing are very different things.
>
> -eleonora
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lingucomponent.openoffice.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lingucomponent.openoffice.org
>
>
