Sargent Ti: In our release notes, the naming standard of feature labels should be unified.
Is it a service group service or a service-l1 module. Look, it's mixed up now The service group feels that it is too high-level. It is suggested to change to the unified mode of service-l1 module and label the features. What do you think? Change the L1 module label to two digits. See if it's both the L1 module feature@ Adamyuanyuan @ Weizhong - Xia Chen Don't use CGS / PES / MGS Adamyuanyuan: Is unification changed to this? Sargent Ti: No, it means not to use the abbreviations of CGS / MGS / PES, which are three service group levels, to label Instead, use EC / ECM / LM / DMS and other abbreviations of service level to label the features. Unify the granularity of feature labels and service level-1 module names Summary: feature label naming conventions use service level abbreviations instead of service cluster abbreviations
