Sorry, I think I expressed that wrong. What I meant was that someone might think that it is referring to the part of the framework ("unit") that does execution. Compare "Execution Filter" and "Execution Unit". I really don't think it's a good idea, and others have pointed out the same thing on IRC.

- David


On 19.03.2009, at 17:20, Noah Fontes wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

David Zülke wrote:
That is bad, because it could also refer to the framework's internal
"engine" to execute something.

This is a moot point. We define the terminology. We need something
suitable that isn't ambiguous with existing terminology, not something
that could potentially be used maybe someday somewhere else.

Noah

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAknCYrAACgkQhitK+HuUQJQ4vgCfRMwRFNfljYmQMmHUbh6hD/DE
1PYAoLeRJ0DfZuh9tuGfErmIAjh4vhKc
=D6BD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.agavi.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Agavi Dev Mailing List
[email protected]
http://lists.agavi.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to