ahh sorry... our view on BD, it is great, anything that helps CF developers is good...
as for their statments of CF5 compability... they support all of the bog standard tags (just like the old CFAnywhere product) but anything that uses OEM technology fails (from my tests) So just be careful... I still want to see a CFMX version... -----Original Message----- From: Taz -=TT=- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 9:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ cf-dev ] Re: Was dev blah blah blah Actually I was asking about MMs view of BD, but I realise that's putting you on the spot a bit. No matter. Taz > My offical view is that the conecpt is cool! (and that is what I am here for, making cool stuff) > > For licence issues please speak to the sales people! They can give you the detailed licensing... > > at a guess if you wanted to put the CFMX server on a CD we would cut an OEM deal but really I am not responsible for that at all... > > L. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
