> getTickCount showed that method 2 was twice as fast. Not sure how much of an > effect the size of the table/data types has on method 1, but Ill probably > stick with CF as it seems to be faster for my purposes.
Plus you can cache the query and make it even faster on the next run. Taz -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
