that's pretty much what I do, and with out all the lock the page should run faster anyway. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Taz -=TT=-" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:09 AM Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] Good/Bad?
> > > > > Thanks guys you have confirmed what I thought : it is all over the > > place...the system is very poor and indeed needs a rewrite but thats not > on > > the cards. > > > > what needs to be done is to copy the session variables into the request > > scope to avoud locking them.... > > > > its a nightmare, it really is! > > Its not a bad thing to do... I tend to use this approach when using session > variables instead of client. But I've never had so many that I needed to > loop through all values in the scope. Usually I just stick a few duplicate > ops in the app_globals.cfm > > <cflock ...blah...> > <cfscript> > Request.Whatever = Duplicate(Session.Whatever); > ... > ... > </cfscript> > </cflock> > > Of course you have to remember to write to the session scope when you change > the values, but its way better to do it this way than constantly locking > session read ops. Same goes for application scope if you're using it. > > Taz > > > -- > ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com -- ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
