ok
so here you are creating a p0inter to a structure in session and in variables scope
but simple values
<cfset session.bla =10>
can be locked
like
<cfset request.bla = session.bla>
yes/
At 10:02 24/10/2002 +0100, you wrote:
when they've finished laughing at that, give them the following code to prove that it does create a pointer:<cflock timeout="5" throwontimeout="No" type="EXCLUSIVE" scope="SESSION"> <cfscript> session.foo = structnew(); session.foo.bar = querynew("mycol"); queryaddrow(session.foo.bar); querysetcell(session.foo.bar, "mycol", 0); writeoutput('session.foo.bar.mycol[1] = ' & session.foo.bar.mycol[1] & '<hr>'); variables.apple = session.foo; variables.apple.bar.mycol[1] = 1; writeoutput('session.foo.bar.mycol[1] = ' & session.foo.bar.mycol[1]); </cfscript> </cflock> changing the value of the variables scoped column in the bar query actually changes the session scoped one. > -----Original Message----- > From: Taz -=TT=- [mailto:chris@;cfmaster.co.uk] > Sent: 24 October 2002 10:15 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] Pointers / Structure again! > > > > yep it does and I am getting it patched ASAP, but for now I > need to prove > > that what they are doing is wrong :-) > > Tell them that Taz says so > > > > -- > ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
