I reckon a trans-dimensional array is the answer.

-----Original Message-----
From: Robertson-Ravo [mailto:Robertson-Ravo]
Sent: 24 October 2002 11:27
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Pointers / Structure again!


I reckon a multidimensional array must be seen as complex.?!

-----Original Message-----
From: Russell Brown [mailto:russell.brown@;Freeserve.com]
Sent: 24 October 2002 11:17
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Pointers / Structure again!


They are complex. I guess its the way ColdFusion handles them. I don't know
how it stands in CFMX but in the c++ coldfusions of yore its clearly a
throwback to the way c++ handles memory. That is why I would guess that
OBJECTS and queries are also moved, copied , passed by reference ( pointer )
than by value ( a true copy ). Don't ask me what happens to that array that
is three levels done in a structure of structures!!
 
Perhaps Lucas or another MacroMeanie can clear this up if they are on list.
 
Russell

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (REC)
[mailto:Neil.Robertson-Ravo@;csd.reedexpo.com] 
        Sent: Thu 24/10/2002 11:06 
        To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' 
        Cc: 
        Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Pointers / Structure again!
        
        

        really, so Arrays will be fine also?........hmmmm....... I thought
they were
        complex variables?
        
        
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: Russell Brown [mailto:russell.brown@;Freeserve.com]
        Sent: 24 October 2002 11:06
        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Pointers / Structure again!
        
        
        >So it is clear : using <cfset to copy session to request is AOK as
long as
        >the value is a simple variable but NOT OK if its a complex variable
(array,
        >structure, wddx....)?
        
        I amnot certain about Queries or com/java objects but I know you are
safe
        with Arrays and Wddx. Coldfusion copies arrays by value, wddx is
just a
        string (therefore a simple value) . Structs are copied and passed by
        reference . Queries anyone ? Com / Java Objects ? (I'd love to know,
must
        languages include such things in the docs mind you!)
        
        Russell
        
                -----Original Message-----
                From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (REC)
        [mailto:Neil.Robertson-Ravo@;csd.reedexpo.com]
                Sent: Thu 24/10/2002 11:00
                To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
                Cc:
                Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Pointers / Structure again!
               
               
        
                Thanks Guys,
               
                So it is clear : using <cfset to copy session to request is
AOK as
        long as
                the value is a simple variable but NOT OK if its a complex
variable
        (array,
                structure, wddx....)?
               
                Neil
               
               
               
                -----Original Message-----
                From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (REC)
                [mailto:Neil.Robertson-Ravo@;csd.reedexpo.com]
                Sent: 24 October 2002 10:55
                To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
                Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Pointers / Structure again!
               
               
                no, but if it was indeed a pointer, surely it would bomb?
               
               
               
                -----Original Message-----
                From: Stephen Moretti [mailto:stephen@;cfmaster.co.uk]
                Sent: 24 October 2002 10:59
                To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] Pointers / Structure again!
               
               
                > whoah horsey :)  looks like we are all a bit vague on this
        issue...
                >
                Points to Rich Wilds previous email.
               
                >
                > I have tried to prove this but it seems that it even with
Full
        Checking
                on,
                > it doesnt bomb out.
                >
                not surprising really, as the checking is on session
variables not
        request
                variables.
               
               
               
               
                --
                ** Archive:
        http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
               
                To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
               
                --
                ** Archive:
        http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
               
                To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
               
                --
                ** Archive:
        http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
               
                To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
                For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
               
               
        
        
        --
        ** Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
        
        To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        
        


-- 
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to