> > That reminds me, does anybody else agree with the fact that > CF's inability to allow the use of CFHTTPPARAM with a CFHTTP > type=get is sucky? >
No... Makes sense to me. Especially if you look at how an HTTP request is made up, it makes perfect sense. Basically, Get and Post do exactly the same things, except that get does it openly (in the URL string) but post does it privately. The fact that you can "post" info using "get" (ie adding a query string) is neither here nor there. Doing it the other way round makes no sense at all (as you can't actually send a string privately using "get"). All CFHTTPPARAM does is replicate the addition of "POST" variables. Paul -- ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
