I've said this before and I'll say it again:
My cat's breath smells of cat food.

;-)

-----Original Message-----
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 January 2003 13:47
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] nested tag question


then you should have said so :-)

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 January 2003 12:22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] nested tag question


What I meant was do tell us of any locking requirements other than those
associated with transactional processing/race conditions.

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Martin 
Sent: 10 January 2003 12:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] nested tag question


Do tell.

-----Original Message-----
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 January 2003 12:14
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] nested tag question


but there are :-)

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 January 2003 12:16
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] nested tag question


Pah, locking schmocking  ;-)
I couldn't tell you. I like to believe that there aren't any locking issues
with CFMX due to it's being based on Java nature. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Justin MacCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 January 2003 12:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] nested tag question



whats the correct locking for using a function in app scope?
any other scope issues I should know about?

@J


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 10 January 2003 11:51
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] nested tag question
> 
> 
> Yeah. You can't define a fn in a particular scope, you need to 
> actually copy it.
> So:
> 
> function yadayada() {
>       whatever;
> }
> 
> 
> application.yadayada = yadayada;  // then set some flag to the 
> effect that the fn has been defined so as not to reread the defn.
> //or
> request.yadayada = yadayada;
> 
> 
> Steve
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> >From: Justin MacCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 10 January 2003 11:47
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] nested tag question
> 
> 
> You can copy the function into request.scope? so 
> 
> function a(){whatever;}
> 
> request.a = a; 
> 
> works? cool. so UDF's are basically variables..
> Can you do 
> 
>       function request.a() {} or something like that?
> 
> Can u tell we skipped from cf4.5 -> MX? 
> 
> @J 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Steve Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 10 January 2003 11:37
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] nested tag question
> > 
> > 
> > You could copy the function definition to the request scope. 
> > Alternatively, putting it in the application scope means that CF 
> > doesn't have to reread the fn definition each page request.
> > 
> > Steve
> 
> 
> -- 
> ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
> 
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> -- 
> ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
> 
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to