Hi Lucas, > 17% market share (yes 17% is a lot in this space
I must say I'm surprised by that figure. Is that report on web somewhere I can read it? Of course JRUN is very good value, one of the best in the "certified" J2ee container market. Also it has some great features, including the Flash stuff and the jini based clustering stuff and as mentioned by Simon, it is well supported on Windows. Of course Jboss isn't J2ee certified, and might never be. > this will help the installed based but it will also help developers of > enterprise systems keep better control over their apps (virtual instances > and all that) and increase the "bang for buck" credibility of the enterprise > server I agree with that completely. I didn't say it was a bad thing that users migrate towards J2ee!!! Have a good weekend, Justin -----Original Message----- From: Lucas Sherwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 August 2003 14:39 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] JRun and CFMX 6.1 (RE: [ cf-dev ] 6.1 mail handling) Hi Justin, <CF_Rant> I am really curious as to where you get your market research. Jrun is the fourth most popular j2ee certified application server with about 17% market share (yes 17% is a lot in this space) Whilst you rarely hear about XYZ big company standardised on JRun (that is normaly websphere or weblogic) you often see JRun running hundreds of apps inside companies who have standardised on Websphere for two reasons. 1. It is cheep 2. It does what it says on the tin, J2EE certified so please don't get me wrong, this will help the installed based but it will also help developers of enterprise systems keep better control over their apps (virtual instances and all that) and increase the "bang for buck" credibility of the enterprise server </CF_Rant> anyway I guess the heat is finally starting to get to the Aussie and it is time to step away from the keyboard have a great weekend! -----Original Message----- >From: Justin MacCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 August 2003 12:51 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] JRun and CFMX 6.1 (RE: [ cf-dev ] 6.1 mail handling) As for Jrun, I would think that this is basically a way to boost the installed base of Jrun, which doesn't seem to be very popular. Jboss, websphere, SUN are really the major players in the J2ee server market. If everyone CFMX install has Jrun installed, that base will increase significantly, and might well be the J2ee container of choice for cf folks to move towards J2ee. Should Jrun be the J2ee server of choice? Well, that is a separate issue :-) -----Original Message----- >From: Kola Oyedeji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 August 2003 12:18 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] JRun and CFMX 6.1 (RE: [ cf-dev ] 6.1 mail handling) Lucas Thanks for the quick response ;-). Is this covered in the docs or is there a technote? Also this raises another question (which you probably cant answer but I'll ask anyway) is it possible that CFMX could soon become a replacement for JRUN? Kola >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Lucas Sherwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: 08 August 2003 09:46 >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: [ cf-dev ] JRun and CFMX 6.1 (RE: [ cf-dev ] 6.1 mail handling) >> >> yes you can, the copy of JRun is for use with CFMX but you can create >> instances in that JRun server that do not contain CFMX. >> >> L. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Kola Oyedeji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: 06 August 2003 12:28 >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] 6.1 mail handling >> >> Lucas >> >> I noted that CFMX now runs on a fully fledged version of JRun does this >> mean we can use JRun without CFMX? >> >> Kola >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Lucas Sherwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> Sent: 06 August 2003 09:06 >> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] 6.1 mail handling >> >> >> >> You got it, >> >> Most of the cfmail features are enterprise only features. We did >> however >> >> generally fix cfmail so it is _much_ more stable on both platforms >> >> >> >> L. >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Tim Blair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> Sent: 05 August 2003 15:14 >> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> Subject: [ cf-dev ] 6.1 mail handling >> >> >> >> Question regarding mail handling in 6.1... >> >> >> >> http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/mx/coldfusion/articles/mail_61.html >> >> >> >> The article above tells that there is "an enhanced mail handler that, >> as >> >> Macromedia lab tests have shown, has been able to handle a volume of >> >> over 1,000,000 e-mail messages per hour", but this is only available >> in >> >> the enterprise edition. >> >> >> >> So is mail from the "standard" edition handled in the same way as >> before >> >> (i.e. slowly) -- single threaded to the mail queue and single >> threaded >> >> from queue to SMTP server? >> >> >> >> Tim. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> >> RAWNET LTD - Internet, New Media and ebusiness Gurus. >> >> Visit our new website at http://www.rawnet.com for >> >> more information about our company, or call us free >> >> anytime on 0800 294 24 24. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Tim Blair >> >> Web Application Engineer, Rawnet Limited >> >> Direct Phone : +44 (0) 1344 393 441 >> >> Switchboard : +44 (0) 1344 393 040 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> >> This message may contain information which is legally >> >> privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the >> >> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any >> >> unauthorised disclosure, copying, distribution or use >> >> of this information is strictly prohibited. Such >> >> notification notwithstanding, any comments, opinions, >> >> information or conclusions expressed in this message >> >> are those of the originator, not of rawnet limited, >> >> unless otherwise explicitly and independently indicated >> >> by an authorised representative of rawnet limited. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> ** Archive: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ >> >> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> -- >> >> ** Archive: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ >> >> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> -- >> ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> -- >> ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
