> Anyone got any hands on experience. We are talking about a > site with more than 2 million hits per month.
go for 'in memory' storage everytime in cases like these. Its faster and memory is cheap cheap cheap, especially compared to upgrading a database that can handle that amount of requests. You'll also free up the db and internal pipeline bandwidths to do other, less 'mundane' tasks. -- ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
