Terry If your pages are not custom tags then there really is no need to call them using the CF_ prefix. In fact this will actually incur a slight overhead as CF searches for the file for the custom tag. If all you are doing is including display pages then cfinclude is the way to go.
HTH Kola >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Terry Riley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: 27 October 2003 09:35 >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: [ cf-dev ] cfinclude versus cf_ >> >> What's the consensus? >> >> Is it better (or faster) to use >> >> '<cfinclude template="xxxx.cfm">' >> >> or >> >> '<cf_xxxx>' >> >> in the middle of a display page? >> >> I've tried both ways, and don't seem to see any difference (on CF5) >> except >> when trying to validate using Studio's built-in validator. >> >> Sure, the second form is easier to type, but does it have any >> disadvantages, except as noted? >> >> Cheers >> Terry >> >> -- >> ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
