"Dependability: Most high-end SCSI hard drives are quite expensive but there
are good reasons for it. They can sustain higher temperatures and stay
mechanically functional despite the expansion of the metal parts with
temperature and and generelly have better build quality. The net result is
that they are the natural choice for enterprise server applications.
Connectors suitable for hot-swapping drives in RAID-systems is something
only SCSI boasts, and helps maintaining large disk arrays where down-time is
unacceptable. "

http://www.acc.umu.se/~sagge/scsi_ide/


Colm

-----Original Message-----
From: Justin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 November 2003 18:51
To: Cfuk
Subject: [ cf-dev ] hardware IDE / SCSI choice



Hi,

I'm spec'ing a few boxes, which will be Win2000/IIS/CFMX on J2EE. There will
be only one large application j2ee/cfm app. running on the boxes, and 2 gigs
DDR ram.

The DB will be on a separate box with scsi raid0 & raid5.

There will be a separate box doing backup of code, deployment settings etc..

There will be a separate dev box (where there may be debug versions with
heavy logging etc.)

The question I have is about SCSI, RAID 0 against IDE.

Considering the above and that a lot of the application will be in memory,
will it make much difference to use IDE against SCSI in this situation?

Thanks Justin







--
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.530 / Virus Database: 325 - Release Date: 22/10/2003

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.530 / Virus Database: 325 - Release Date: 22/10/2003


-- 
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to