If the page takes 100ms without IIF and 100ms with IIF, it doesn't matter
how many page requests u get, they still take the same time to render.

100 vistors x 100ms still equals the same.
The total combined may add a few ms extra as all the fractions of a ms add
up, but that's like counting grains of sand.

Russ Michaels
Macromedia/Allaire Certified ColdFusion Developer
 
CFMX Hosting
Phone: 0845 456 3487
Tech Support: 0906 9607800
FAX: 0709 2212 636
WEB: cfmxhosting.co.uk
 
>Please use the support helpdesk on our web site to submit support tickets.<

Join our ColdFusion Developer discussion lists.
Send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 21 January 2004 16:18
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Nested IIf functions
> 
> 
> 
> what if you had say 100 sites, each with 100 pages.  in each 
> of those pages you use IIF where you could have used 
> something faster.  each site gets thousands of hits a day.  
> could that not have a cumulative effect on cf server's performance?
> 
> the whole point of writing code that is marginally faster in 
> performance than something else, isn't because it's 
> super-duper faster on one run-through, or that you're only 
> meant to use it in nested loops.  it's to improve overall 
> performance in the long run, isn't it?
> 
> 
> Duncan Cumming
> IT Manager
> 
> http://www.alienationdesign.co.uk 
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Tel: 0141 575 9700
> Fax: 0141 575 9600
> 
> Creative solutions in a technical world
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Get your domain names online from: http://www.alienationdomains.co.uk
> Reseller options available!
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
>                                                               
>                                                         
>                     "Snake                                    
>                                                         
>                     Hollywood"              To:     
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                                     
>                     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]        cc:               
>                                                         
>                     kepit.net>              Subject:     RE: 
> [ cf-dev ] Nested IIf functions                          
>                                                               
>                                                         
>                     21/01/2004 16:14                          
>                                                         
>                     Please respond                            
>                                                         
>                     to dev                                    
>                                                         
>                                                               
>                                                         
>                                                               
>                                                         
> 
> 
> 
> I hate when people start this.
> You will only see any overhead if you use hundreds of IIF 
> statements in a page or in some sort of nested loop. 
> Otherwise the difference is too small to notice, it wont even 
> make a 1ms difference to your page if you have a cfif instead 
> of an IIF.
> 
> Russ Michaels
> Macromedia/Allaire Certified ColdFusion Developer
> 
> CFMX Hosting
> Phone: 0845 456 3487
> Tech Support: 0906 9607800
> FAX: 0709 2212 636
> WEB: cfmxhosting.co.uk
> 
> >Please use the support helpdesk on our web site to submit support 
> >tickets.
> <
> 
> Join our ColdFusion Developer discussion lists.
> Send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: EWS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 21 January 2004 10:44
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] Nested IIf functions
> >
> >
> > Just a quick point. IIF is great but use sparingly. If possible use 
> > CFSWITCH of CFIF as IIf does have a greater processing overhead. If 
> > this is not possible then IIf is fine and does a great job.
> >
> > Just a thought
> >
> > On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 10:34:25 -0000, Tomo Smith 
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > #IIf(GetPatients.wait_time_mins[i] GT 381000,
> > >  DE("red"), 'IIf(GetPatients.wait_time_mins[i] GT 375000, 
> > > DE("orange"),  DE("blue"))')#
> > >
> > > try the iif statement above.  I changed your DEs to use
> > double quotes,
> > > and
> > > your inner IIF has single quotes around it, otherwise it 
> wont work!
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Tom
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Osullivan Karl (RKB) Senior Analyst/Programmer" 
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "CF - Development Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 10:27 AM
> > > Subject: [ cf-dev ] Nested IIf functions
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >> UHCWT Logo
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Hello
> > >>
> > >> Is it possible to nest IIf statements, as I'm trying to do the
> > >> following:
> > >>
> > >> style="background-color:#IIf(GetPatients.wait_time_mins[i]
> > GT 381000,
> > >> DE('red'), IIf(GetPatients.wait_time_mins[i] GT 375000,
> > DE('orange'),
> > >> DE('blue')))#;"
> > >>
> > >> However, when I run this, the following message appears
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Variable orange is undefined.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Is my syntax wrong?  I thought it looked okay.  Obviously
> > the above
> > >> is within a <CFOUTPUT> tag.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Karl O'Sullivan
> > >> Senior Analyst/Programmer
> > >>
> > >> Computer & Network Services
> > >> UHCW NHS Trust
> > >> Clifford Bridge Road
> > >> COVENTRY
> > >> CV2 2DX
> > >>
> > >> Contact:
> > >> Tel (internal): 28952
> > >> Tel (external): +44 (0) 24 7696 8952
> > >> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >> Web: www.uhcw.nhs.uk
> > <http://www.uhcw.nhs.uk>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > ** Archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%> 40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
> >
> 
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] For 
> > human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> 
> 
> --
> ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
> 
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/
> 
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


--
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to