Thanks salvatore for a very clear presentation of machii. Regarding: "machii does not need a wireframe (fusebuilder adalon etc.)"
Wireframing is an important part of the FuseBox Lifecycle Process (FLiP) design methodology and is used to gather requirements from the user as well as let the user get a feel for the system through usage. UML tools can do something similar [Use Cases, Constraint Diagrams, System Modes Model, etc) to represent the requirements of the user but are not really great for user-centered design. So 1. What design methodology(s) would be recommeded for the machii life cycle. 2. Is only FuseBox - well FLiP - user-centered? I look forward to any responses, Sam -----Original Message----- From: ing. fusto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 02 April 2004 15:04 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] FuseBox hello, i do not know fusebox 4 very well, but i know that it's approach is procedural: when developing, you must follow a cascade approach; machii allows a oop approach to the problem and then you can use an successive iteraction in analisys-development system, i.e. you can in every phase turn back and change anything; it is really simple change specifics and/or add part never thoght before, as every part is uncoupled (yes fb4 permits uncoupling ad MVC, but these are natural in machii: uncoupling is not only separate model presentation logic, but also to separate application actors fron each oter and from application context; it also permits or forces to write high-coesion object: an object has to do 1 thing) machii does not need a wireframe (fusebuilder adalon etc.): hope this is usefull best regards salvatore ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sam Westlake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 12:24 PM Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] FuseBox > I have looked at mach-ii and it seems to offer all the benefits of OOP, as > you say salvatore. > > I have already built a few apps in FB 4 and am wondering if instead of > carrying on down this route I should try mach-ii instead? I have Java > programming experience so the idea of OOP is appealing but I like the way > FuseBox works. > > Apart from the design principles and uncoupling of presentation / logic / > content (FB 4 support MVC really well already), what are the other > real-world benefits? > > Kind regards, > > Sam > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ing. fusto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 02 April 2004 11:15 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] FuseBox > > fusebox (4 too) are procedural tools at all, machii allows an oop design and > development of applications and allows easily the use of techiques such as > high choesion and low coupling of classes, each other and from application, > design pattern as MVC and composite views, anf so on. > it' s not difficult to understand and use, also for inexpertise oop > programmers. > best regards > salvatore > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 12:08 PM > Subject: [ cf-dev ] FuseBox > > > > Hi All,<BR><BR>I noticed that there is some talk on these threads of > mach-ii. I just wondered if anybody has been using FuseBox 4. <BR><BR>Any > feedback / thoughts? > > > > -- > These lists are syncronised with the CFDeveloper forum at http://forum.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > > CFDeveloper Sponsors and contributors:- > *Hosting and support provided by CFMXhosting.co.uk* :: *ActivePDF provided by activepdf.com* > *Forums provided by fusetalk.com* :: *ProWorkFlow provided by proworkflow.com* > *Tutorials provided by helmguru.com* :: *Lists hosted by gradwell.com* > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- These lists are syncronised with the CFDeveloper forum at http://forum.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ CFDeveloper Sponsors and contributors:- *Hosting and support provided by CFMXhosting.co.uk* :: *ActivePDF provided by activepdf.com* *Forums provided by fusetalk.com* :: *ProWorkFlow provided by proworkflow.com* *Tutorials provided by helmguru.com* :: *Lists hosted by gradwell.com* To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- These lists are syncronised with the CFDeveloper forum at http://forum.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ CFDeveloper Sponsors and contributors:- *Hosting and support provided by CFMXhosting.co.uk* :: *ActivePDF provided by activepdf.com* *Forums provided by fusetalk.com* :: *ProWorkFlow provided by proworkflow.com* *Tutorials provided by helmguru.com* :: *Lists hosted by gradwell.com* To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
