Thanks, Mark! It occured to me that the intention had been to put an exclusive named lock instead of a session lock - at least that would have made some sense....
Terry ----------Original Message--------- > > >If neither of the queries utilises or sets a session variable, can > anyone > >see any reason to have the queries within a readonly session cflock, > >within the <cftransaction> block? > > nope -- These lists are syncronised with the CFDeveloper forum at http://forum.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ CFDeveloper Sponsors and contributors:- *Hosting and support provided by CFMXhosting.co.uk* :: *ActivePDF provided by activepdf.com* *Forums provided by fusetalk.com* :: *ProWorkFlow provided by proworkflow.com* *Tutorials provided by helmguru.com* :: *Lists hosted by gradwell.com* To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
