"but quite often, it's because the spec changes so often in development, its just not worth using SPs until the damn thing settles down a bit."
Amen :OD -----Original Message----- From: Alistair Davidson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 August 2004 15:17 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Exceptions I agree, stored procedures are usually the best way to go, but as a general rule I develop using cfqueries and migrate them to SPs as and when required. There are many reasons for this (crazy security policies / dev leads who don't like using sp's as they like to see "everything in one page" / internal politics / etc etc etc.. general corporate crap, usually) but quite often, it's because the spec changes so often in development, its just not worth using SPs until the damn thing settles down a bit. -- These lists are syncronised with the CFDeveloper forum at http://forum.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ CFDeveloper Sponsors and contributors:- *Hosting and support provided by CFMXhosting.co.uk* :: *ActivePDF provided by activepdf.com* *Forums provided by fusetalk.com* :: *ProWorkFlow provided by proworkflow.com* *Tutorials provided by helmguru.com* :: *Lists hosted by gradwell.com* To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
