I was worried that it would not be free for open-source projects, but apparently it is (https://bitbucket.org/plans). OK then.
Yannick El mar, 15-02-2011 a las 21:45 +0100, Philippe Van Eerdenbrugghe escribió: > The main reason is that mercurial doesn't handle well sub project in a > single repo. Mercurial is really meant for one package = at least one > repo (most of the time multiple repos or branches per package ). For > example there is no way to partially checkout a mercurial repo. > > that leads to a lot of repos since we have a lot of "packages" (each > application, each content_object, each external repository driver, each > video conferencing driver) but unfortunately google only provides 10 > repos max for a project and therefore we would need more than 7 google > projects... > > Bitbucket has a smarter way of handling a bigger number of related repos. > > This the big picture of the why but if someone sees something I miss, > feel free to add it ^^ > > We can discuss the reasons behind that move friday, too. > > Systho > > > Le 15/02/2011 21:17, Yannick Warnier a écrit : > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> as most of you know, Chamilo 2 is changing its Version Control Host and > >> is also defining a package policy. > > Hi, > > > > I didn't know about that but would be interested in the train of > > thoughts that led to the decision (is that based on these discussions > > about having branches for dev and stable versions and stuff?). > > > > IRC log, anyone? > > > > Yannick > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev@lists.chamilo.org > http://lists.chamilo.org/listinfo/dev _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@lists.chamilo.org http://lists.chamilo.org/listinfo/dev
