Does someone sees a problem if an optional app (not the core) uses its own coding convention ?

We (the claroline team) are thinking to follow this convention for naming the classes : http://groups.google.com/group/php-standards/web/psr-0-final-proposal except for the ones loaded by the framework (Notably the data manager, the manager and the components)


Actually I do not understand the reason for all the CamelCase-to-underdscore mechanism so if someone can enlight me on this subject it would be greatly appreciated.

Systho

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
Dev@lists.chamilo.org
http://lists.chamilo.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to