Sorry, i just rememberd a discussion Michael Renner recently had with Pedro, in which Pedro stated that redis doesn’t have to be persistent anyway. Okay, if that’s the case, we will just do away with the idea of sentinel altogether.
Best regards Martin > Am 29.04.2015 um 21:20 schrieb Martin Loschwitz <[email protected]>: > > Hallo Raj, > > no. We’re running Redis with Sentinel here, and access to Redis is possible > through an > HAProxy load balancer that will ensure that nodes always land on the one > redis node that > is currently the master of the sentinel cluster. I don’t see how scaling out > redis for purposes > of performance and high availability would work in any other way. We’ll need > the analytics > api to be fixed to allow to specify an arbitrary ip address to connect to > redis. Shall I fill a > bug in Launchpad? > > Best regards > Martin > >> Am 29.04.2015 um 21:17 schrieb Raj Reddy <[email protected]>: >> >> Hi Martin, >> >> It appears we are relying on the fact that redis is listening on 0.0.0.0 >> You can comment the redis.conf bindip parameter or change it to 0.0.0.0 >> >> regards, >> - >> Raj > _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org
