Edouard,

Current thinking is that in backend agent will use the link local ip to access 
to VM. 

Following protocols are planned. 
1. Ping. 
2. Http. 
3. Ftp. 

At lowest level there will be health monitor object. It can be attached to 
interface. 
Limitation currently is that link local will be translated to instance ip. So 
VM (member) should support health monitor on instance ip. 

Floating ip, vip and static routes already track instance ip. 

Currently we are not taking up this until August end. 

Regards
-Harshad


> On Jun 12, 2015, at 9:22 AM, Édouard Thuleau <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Pedro,
> 
>>     We did have plans to implement a provider for the LBaaS API that would 
>> implement this but this is also related to the next question...
> Any news/update around that?
> Did you wrote a blueprint ? Can we follow the work on a review thread?
> 
>>     Implementation-wise this is fairly incremental… the hardest part is to 
>> define a schema for the health-monitoring probes. The vrouter-agent can 
>> easily periodically run commands: whether a simple http query or an external 
>> script… The status of these would then need to be fed back to the 
>> conditional advertisement of the virtual IP addresses.
> How you finally decide to health check the backend?
> 
> Édouard.
> 
>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Pedro Marques <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> On May 28, 2015, at 12:30 AM, Stefan Andres <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> On 26.05.15 18:24, Pedro Marques wrote:
>> 
>> Equal cost multi path… (assuming that you don’t modify the route
>> preferences).
>> 
>> 
>> Hey Pedro,
>> how do I set that (giving 1 floating IP to two VMs) up exactly for two VMs?
>> 
>> 
>> Today that has to be performed via the contrail API directly.
>> We did have plans to implement a provider for the LBaaS API that would
>> implement this but this is also related to the next question...
>> 
>> 
>> Is it smart enough not to send any packages when one VM is not reachable?
>> 
>> 
>> Not at the moment. There are multiple applications that require the vrouter
>> to be able to perform heath monitoring in a distributed fashion. And make
>> advertisement of service-chain and VIP routes conditional on the VM
>> answering the health monitor probes.
>> 
>> Implementation-wise this is fairly incremental… the hardest part is to
>> define a schema for the health-monitoring probes. The vrouter-agent can
>> easily periodically run commands: whether a simple http query or an external
>> script… The status of these would then need to be fed back to the
>> conditional advertisement of the virtual IP addresses.
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Stefan
>> 
>> 
>> Pedro.
>> 
>> On May 26, 2015, at 9:03 AM, [email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> A single fip assigned to multiple vmis? What will that do exactly?
>> 
>> 
>> (Sent from my phone)
>> 
>> Soren Hansen
>> AVP, Chief Cloud Architect
>> Reliance Jio Infocomm, Ltd.
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* Dev <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Pedro
>> Marques <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> *Sent:* 26 May 2015 17:33
>> *To:* 王李明
>> *Cc:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> *Subject:* Re: [opencontrail-dev] can contrail use lvs for loadbalance
>> 
>> LBaaS API is only supported with proxy mode at the moment.
>> You can however create a floating-ip in any network and assign a
>> floating-ip to multiple instances via the contrail API. That will
>> provide you with the equivalent functionality.
>> 
>> Pedro.
>> 
>> On May 24, 2015, at 7:33 PM, 王李明 <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> hi Pedro:
>>        I know the contrail 2.0 is support haproxy
>> but  *the mode of Direct Routing for lvs is not support*
>> * *
>> *I want to know whether contrail can support lvs Direct Routing mode ?***
>> *发件人:* Pedro Marques [mailto:[email protected]]
>> *发送时间:* 2015年5月23日 6:28
>> *收件人:* 王李明
>> *抄送:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> *主题:* Re: [opencontrail-dev] can contrail use lvs for loadbalance
>> 
>> Recent code versions (2.0+) support LBaaS. neutron.conf needs to be
>> updated in order to enable this functionality.
>> 
>> AFAIK the settings are:
>> 
>> [DEFAULT]
>> service_plugins =
>> neutron_plugin_contrail.plugins.opencontrail.loadbalancer.plugin.LoadBalancerPlugin
>> 
>> 
>> [service_providers]
>> service_provider =
>> LOADBALANCER:Opencontrail:neutron_plugin_contrail.plugins.opencontrail.loadbalancer.driver.OpencontrailLoadbalancerDriver:default
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On May 22, 2015, at 5:51 AM, 王李明 <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> hi all:
>>        I have test for lvs but I find it is can not work
>>        can contrail use lvs for loadbalance now ?
>> 
>> any help will be appricate
>> 
>> Wang Liming
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dev mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> "*Confidentiality Warning*: This message and any attachments are
>> intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are
>> confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended
>> recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, re-transmission,
>> conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other use of this
>> message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
>> intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return
>> email and delete this message and any attachments from your system.
>> *Virus Warning:* Although the company has taken reasonable precautions
>> to ensure no viruses are present in this email. The company cannot
>> accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of
>> this email or attachment."
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> SysEleven GmbH
>> Umspannwerk - Aufgang C
>> Ohlauer Straße 43
>> 10999 Berlin
>> 
>> Tel +49 30 233 2012 0
>> Fax +49 30 616 755 50
>> 
>> http://www.syseleven.de
>> http://www.facebook.com/SysEleven
>> 
>> Firmensitz: Berlin
>> Registergericht: AG Berlin Charlottenburg, HRB 108571 B
>> Geschäftsführer: Marc Korthaus, Thomas Lohner, Jens Ihlenfeld
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org

Reply via email to