I'm running contrail 2.10 and I validated multicast with jgroups. I haven't
tested in 2.2 yet but maybe this could give you another angle to try?

https://github.com/rednut/docker-multicast-jgroups

Node1:
java -cp /opt/jgroups-3.3.3.Final.jar org.jgroups.tests.McastSenderTest
-mcast_addr 239.1.2.3 -port 44444

Node2:
java -cp /opt/jgroups-3.3.3.Final.jar org.jgroups.tests.McastReceiverTest
-mcast_addr 239.1.2.3 -port 44444

HTH,

Doug


On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Filip Pytloun <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> we have setup where some applications needs to send/receive multicast
> packets. These apps are running on bare metal compute nodes where
> vrouter is set up with vhost0 interface (which is the only active
> interface on these hosts).
>
> Unfortunately we are facing the issue when multicast packets are sent
> with no issue over vhost0 interface:
>
>     iperf -c 239.1.2.3 -u -T 32 -t 3 -i 1
>
> But are not received on another host over vhost0:
>
>     iperf -s -u -B 239.1.2.3 -i 1
>
> The same test is working fine on the same hosts without vrouter
> installed (using physical network interface to receive packets).
>
> Multicast seems to be set up correctly:
>
>     $ netstat -g | grep vhost0
>     vhost0          2      239.1.2.3
>     vhost0          1      all-systems.mcast.net
>     vhost0          1      ff02::1:ff59:3afe
>     vhost0          1      ip6-allnodes
>     vhost0          1      ff01::1
>
> We are running OpenContrail R2.20.
> Does anyone experience the same issue?
>
> Thanks in advance for any ideas,
>
> Filip
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org
>
>


-- 

*Doug Lardo *// *Riot Games* // c: 818.620.7046 // summoner: Riot Antares

Q: Why is this email 5 sentences or less? A: http://five.sentenc.es
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org

Reply via email to