Hello Robert. Thanks for quick reply. I hope there is some work already is doing. On the other hand, we can contribute in developing/verification/code review to make it's done. Just to have no conflicts if someone is already doing this. Thanks again.
2017-09-04 16:01 GMT+04:00 Van Leeuwen, Robert <rovanleeu...@ebay.com>: > > Appropriate bug is filed in Launchpad > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/opencontrail/+bug/1702856 > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugs.launchpad.net%2Fopencontrail%2F%2Bbug%2F1702856&data=02%7C01%7Crovanleeuwen%40ebay.com%7Cc4f63dd7ec5f47ad230508d4f384d309%7C46326bff992841a0baca17c16c94ea99%7C0%7C0%7C636401199178329242&sdata=FkHFpcSQmXIs1bNSIDjZn%2BXwaQ%2BgUM9q0HeHZtEsKD4%3D&reserved=0> > > > > > >This behaviour does not look correct, but due to architecture statement ( > https://github.com/Juniper/contrail-controller/wiki/DNS-and-IPAM > <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FJuniper%2Fcontrail-controller%2Fwiki%2FDNS-and-IPAM&data=02%7C01%7Crovanleeuwen%40ebay.com%7Cc4f63dd7ec5f47ad230508d4f384d309%7C46326bff992841a0baca17c16c94ea99%7C0%7C0%7C636401199178329242&sdata=%2FdAb1PZWkSIsWmCVkXiIX4dwrzSXbjv4%2FJt%2Bvwys1aE%3D&reserved=0>) > that name of DNS record is actual name of VM server can’t handle this > situation. So two questions are in my mind > > > > > > 1 - Is there any possibility to extend DNS record name in respect to > “other” parameters in such way to avoid situation above? > > > 2 - Is there any need to create additional handling for situation above? > Since it’s pretty narrow case I wonder if it makes sense to add extensions > to agent/server behaviour. > > > > We filed a ticket with Juniper a while ago about this. > > Below is the last info I have about it, we switched to designate so I > closed the case after that: > > > > Current Status: > > The issue is reproduced and reported to developers in LP#1671870. > > > > Next Action: > > We have to carry the the information in each DNS record as to which > compute the VM was spawned. > Engineering will fix it in release 4.0. > > > > Cheers, > > Robert > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev@lists.opencontrail.org > http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org > > -- *Best Regards* *Sergey Matov* *Mirantis Inc*
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@lists.opencontrail.org http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org
