We want everyone to use `oc adm`. All `oadm` is is a symlink to it. On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 3:08 PM, Dusty Mabe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hey Everyone, > > There is an issue I opened against minishift [1] to request that `oadm` > be placed on the user's machine as well as `oc`. In this discussion in > that issue the question of `oadm` vs `oc adm` came up. Can we get some > advice on the future perspective of these two. > > Will openshift docs continue to call `oadm` directly or will all new docs > use `oc adm` instead? > > Feel free to comment on the discussion in the bug if you want. > > Thanks, > Dusty > > [1] https://github.com/minishift/minishift/issues/587 > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/dev >
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/dev
