Thanks Clayton .
-- Srinivas Kotaru From: Clayton Coleman <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 at 5:29 PM To: Srinivas Naga Kotaru <[email protected]> Cc: dev <[email protected]> Subject: Re: quota question It's definitely not the latter (requested memory for the node is 15GB total). It would almost certainly place B, then if A doesn't release memory it would be evicted because it is using the most over its request on the node and there is no other priority rules in place (guaranteed -> burstable -> best-effort) On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:14 PM, Srinivas Naga Kotaru (skotaru) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Want to validate a statement. Just assume, we have a only one node with 60 GB memory. Pod A scheduled with request of 10 GB and no limit. After some time, it start using 55 GB ( ignore systems reserves for now). system now has only left with 5 GB free. If new podB scheduled with request of 10GB, what is systems behavior? * Will it place Pod A and evict PodB softly since it can’t accommodate both pods on same node? * Scheduling fail to pod B since it can’t accommodate since node doesn’t enough requested memory? -- Srinivas Kotaru _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/dev
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/dev
