Buildah supports multistage builds. Could that be used to do the  builds?

Thanks,
Kevin
________________________________
From: dev-boun...@lists.openshift.redhat.com 
[dev-boun...@lists.openshift.redhat.com] on behalf of Santosh Kumar30 
[sk00546...@techmahindra.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 10:07 AM
To: Mark Wagner; Jeremy Eder
Cc: dev@lists.openshift.redhat.com
Subject: RE: Is Docker enterprise version subscription required for Openshift 
3.7


Are you saying that we require docker17 or later for Hyperledger fabric image 
deployment ?
If yes, definitely we require additional Docker enterprise edition subscription 
to deploy it on Openshift 3.7, is this assumption is correct?

Regards,
Santosh Kumar

From: Mark Wagner <mwag...@redhat.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 8:18 PM
To: Jeremy Eder <je...@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@lists.openshift.redhat.com; Santosh Kumar30 
<sk00546...@techmahindra.com>
Subject: Re: Is Docker enterprise version subscription required for Openshift 
3.7

>From the upstream Fabric list.

Technically, at runtime right now Docker 1.13 or later will work for pure 
Docker and/or Kubernetes.
The samples and example network rely on later versions of docker-compose which 
I believe require some features of Docker 17.06 and later (I think in the area 
of networks and volumes but don't recall explicitly and we definitely use 
docker exec commands in some of the samples which require 17.06).

With 1.3 and earlier, you should still be able to build with Docker 1.13, but 
with the current master we've moved to multistage builds which require 17.06 
and later to build.

Hope this helps.

FWIW, I was able to use the Docker 1.13 version which ships with Redhat 7.x to 
build and run Redhat-based Fabric images.

-- G

On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 9:09 AM, Jeremy Eder 
<je...@redhat.com<mailto:je...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Mark, do you know where the version requirement in the hyperledger docs comes 
from?

On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 7:50 AM Santosh Kumar30 
<sk00546...@techmahindra.com<mailto:sk00546...@techmahindra.com>> wrote:
Hi,

I am recently started exploring openshift. I am a Hyperledger blockcahin 
developer.
I am trying to create a blockchain network containing which will contain 
Hyperledger – peer, orderer, cli… and there images have been provided by 
Hyperledger.

As per the Hyperledger doc, these images only compatable with Docker version 
17.06.2-ce or greater .
https://hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io/en/release-1.3/prereqs.html#docker-and-docker-compose

But as Openshift 3.7 release note: 
https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.7/release_notes/ocp_3_7_release_notes.html#ocp-37-about-this-release

OpenShift Container Platform 3.7 is supported on RHEL 7.3, 7.4.2, 7.5, and 
Atomic Host 7.4.2 and newer with the latest packages from Extras, including 
Docker 1.12.

So my query here is if I need docker 17 or later version for this openshift 
3.7, Whether I required Docker enterprise version subscription as on RHEL linux 
system, docker CE version will not work?


Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Santosh Kumar
============================================================================================================================
Disclaimer:  This message and the information contained herein is proprietary 
and confidential and subject to the Tech Mahindra policy statement, you may 
review the policy at http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html externally 
http://tim.techmahindra.com/tim/disclaimer.html internally within TechMahindra.
============================================================================================================================
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@lists.openshift.redhat.com<mailto:dev@lists.openshift.redhat.com>
http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/dev


--

-- Jeremy Eder



--
Mark Wagner
Senior Principal Software Engineer
Performance and Scalability
Red Hat, Inc
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@lists.openshift.redhat.com
http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to