Michał Masłowski <[email protected]> writes: >> +1 though a pull request is something that only exists in github i >> think? > > git has a request-pull command since 2005. Some tools use the > equivalent term "merge request".
i know, but it just sends an email telling you from where to pull, you still need to host somewhere and not everywhere has the time or willingness to autohost. >> we can receive patches on this list, but almost no one has >> sendmail(-like) configured on their systems (could be part of such >> contributing guide) > > I don't, git send-email can use e.g. SMTP or IMAP. Some people send > emails via usual clients with attached patches (making review harder). right, i forgot about smtp (local sendmail is way cooler :P) >> you could also host your abslibre.git clone anywhere and ask us to pull >> and review from there, even github though it'd be cool if we didn't have >> to rely on unfree services. > > Or we could host an instance of GitLab, Gitorious or other similar > software. i wouldn't mind using gitlab (i already use it for work), though it'll require changing our issue tracker yet another time, though it'll merge projects and labs subdomains. i read trisquel is using gitlab now too. that said i prefer gitlab over redmine and i can ask a friend who's hosting our gitlab in parabola for his experience setting it up. > If we decide to prefer patches on the list, we need additional >software to know what state the patches are, so we won't forget them. this would be awesome and more transparent for development -- http://vqfe4xmhxzi7w2uv.onion
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
