> * if we'd like Ceata to provide legal counsel too, we'd need to talk > copyright assignments. i personally like bkuhn's position on this[0] > (every contributor is a copyright holder) but it's a decision we need > to make collectively.
-1 for any copyright policy other than inbound=outbound with possibly a DCO. > i think the donations page should thank Ceata for their support and > have a short description on their work (and we can do this on a > separate page for other kind of supporters, to be fair to them). +1. Some people prefer donating to projects where they see that it goes via a trusted organization. > they also proppose we add a "with the fiscal support of Ceata > Foundation" suffix to our description on the GNU free distros list[1], > but since there's been arguments against before[2] we need to decide > on this. One other distro on the list mentions being sponsored by the FSF (having servers hosted by them, but it's more impressive without that detail). It's a question for GNU Webmasters or the FSF Licensing and Compliance Lab, depending on who makes such decisions there, not for us.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
