freaj <[email protected]> writes:

> Hi everybody, I'm browsing the repos in Parabola and also I was
>talking to Emulatorman about it.  Do you plan to keep mips64el to work
>or not? Few packages have been updated one month ago, almost the rest
>is from one year ago. If no one uses it, would it be better to clean?
><https://www.parabola.nu/packages/?page=1&sort=-last_update&repo=Core&maintainer=&q=&arch=mips64el&flagged=>

i think we should archive at least the [core] and [libre] repos.
otherwise anyone wanting to restart the porting process would have to
start from scratch.

> Also, for PCR, I'd like to know if we could do something about
>outdated and more importantly unused programs in it? I'm sure there are
>a lot of programs which need updates, sure, but some of them need to be
>removed.
><https://www.parabola.nu/packages/?sort=last_update&arch=mips64el&repo=Pcr&q=&maintainer=&flagged=>
>For example the older package is from 2 years ago, even more.  I'm
>willing to help on this side, just need to know who wants those
>packages until I do it.  -- freaj <[email protected]>

those are mips64el still :P


-- 
:D

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to