I think that having one or two trusted delegates is a good idea, then simply transfer/convert any of the btc needed to the ceata account and report it as fiat when needed.
Alternatively, something like BitPay would be nice. I don't think they support anything other than USD currently. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitPay On 11/10/2015 08:30 AM, fauno wrote: > so since there's been some donations in btc to buy the bbb, we were > discussing with tiberiu which entity should manage the wallet... > > * currently, all cash donations are managed by ceata under the fiscal > sponsorship agreement i signed for parabola > > * except for the btc (and the fair) wallet that's being handled by me > as parabola delegate. > > * since btc doesn't need to be fiscally declared, i assumed we didn't > need to bother ceata with it. but at the same time it's not under any > signed agreement, but your current trust in me. i could use it at my > sole discretion or i could not be available anymore. > > * if ceata were to manage the btc donations, they'd have to convert them > to romanian money so it's fiscally declared. > > * having more than a single entity managing the funds could lead to > confusion to where the money is and how it can be handled. > > > so the issue here is which entity should handle the btc donations, the > parabola delegate or ceata? > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
